Read more here, KPMG’s Intellectually Suspect Olympic Site Review, 18 November 2008.
"... from the summary of the conclusions in that leaked email, the justification is so tortuous, the liberties taken with the truth so great, as to render this report one of the more intellectually suspect pieces of work I’ve seen (and I did read the Hutton Inquiry.) ... It shows the true case for Greenwich is so weak that they can only make it by making it up. If Locog expect this report to settle any arguments, they will, I fear, be disappointed."
1 comment:
Apparently the impact assessments won't be available till autumn next year, by which time it may be too late to change venues. In the meantime LOCOG base their case, or should I say spin, on the basis that there was no damage to the Hong Kong course. This is a spurious comparison: you can't compare a man-made golf course, specially laid with tough grass, to a fragile World Heritage Site.
Post a Comment